The terms "Madkhali" and "Madkhalis" or "Madaakhilah" are used and applied in a derogatory sense by numerous factions of people in order to scapegoat one particular Scholar for their own woes and for the demise and downfall of their innovated methodologies and their figureheads (see further below). In reality, this is not about one particular Scholar. They use these terms in order to veil and conceal their hate, resentment and enmity to the generality of the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah, the people of Hadeeth and Athar, even if they make opportune attachments to some of them and some of their sayings.
The bulk of these people ally with and defend the Ashaa'irah such as Hassan al-Banna, a Soofee Mufawidh, and Sayyid Qutb, an Ash'ari and former socialist, communist, who organized and planned the July 1952 revolution that put his friend Jamal Abdul-Nasser into power through the Leninist type revolution which he later put into writing in his books Milestones and "az-Zilal" (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here ). Also Muhammad Qutb (brother of Sayyid Qutb) and his various pawns and stooges from within Saudi Arabia (who are referred to as the Qutbiyyah). He was referred to as a "dangerous Ash'ari" by the muhaddith and scholar of al-Madinah, Hammad al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) - see here.
The greatest and biggest grievance of these people is that the two broad methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen (the Muslim Brotherhood), represented in:
* The populist, mass-movement of Hasan al-Banna aimed at arriving at the Khilaafah (through involvement in the current secular political apparatus, by hook or by crook) and,
* The Leninist approach of Sayyid Qutb who "Islamicized" the revolutionary ideologies of secular atheist Jews and in particular, Lenin's manifesto with an Islamic garb (see here).
The grievance is that these have been refuted, exposed and demolished by the Scholars of the Sunnah and they are grieved that some of these Scholars highlighted the great evil of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen in splitting the ranks of the Muslims over the latter half of the twentieth century, embedding vile-partisanship in the Ummah, introducing their own legislations in their jamaa'aat and demanding pledges of allegiance to those legislations, rousing and inciting the people to make Takfir of the rulers and to topple them with Leninist type revolutions and so on. The fact that all of this was exposed and refuted, collectively by the Scholars out of naseehah to the people in their religion and out of obedience to Allaah and His Messenger to stand against what is foreign to Allaah's deen, has really grieved these people. A string of individuals such as Safar al-Hawali, Salman al-Awdah, Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaliq, Adnaan Ar'oor, Muhammad al-Maghrawi, Abu al-Hasan al-Ma'ribi amongst others, were all responsible for propagating these methodologies, in varying layers of subtlety, concealed under a veil of what appeared to be Salafiyyah.
The grievance of these people is not really with one particular Scholar (Shaykh Rabee' bin Haadee al-Madkhali) whom they use as a scapegoat. It is actually with the generality of Scholars, particularly in Saudi Arabia, who by Allaah's praise, are upon Tawheed, calling to it, defending it, they are upon the Salafi aqidah, calling to it and defending it, and they are upon the Salafi methodologies in da'wah and reform, opposing and refuting the innovated methodologies which originated with the non-Muslims, and introduced to the Muslims through figureheads like Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. And as Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan said that all of this is a thorn in the throats of the people of hypocrisy and dissension.
The terms "Madkhali" and "Madkhalis" or "Madaakhilah" are used and applied in a derogatory sense by numerous factions of people in order to scapegoat one particular Scholar for their own woes and for the demise and downfall of their innovated methodologies and their figureheads (see further below). In reality, this is not about one particular Scholar. They use these terms in order to veil and conceal their hate, resentment and enmity to the generality of the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah, the people of Hadeeth and Athar, even if they make opportune attachments to some of them and some of their sayings.
ReplyDeleteThe bulk of these people ally with and defend the Ashaa'irah such as Hassan al-Banna, a Soofee Mufawidh, and Sayyid Qutb, an Ash'ari and former socialist, communist, who organized and planned the July 1952 revolution that put his friend Jamal Abdul-Nasser into power through the Leninist type revolution which he later put into writing in his books Milestones and "az-Zilal" (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here ). Also Muhammad Qutb (brother of Sayyid Qutb) and his various pawns and stooges from within Saudi Arabia (who are referred to as the Qutbiyyah). He was referred to as a "dangerous Ash'ari" by the muhaddith and scholar of al-Madinah, Hammad al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) - see here.
The greatest and biggest grievance of these people is that the two broad methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen (the Muslim Brotherhood), represented in:
* The populist, mass-movement of Hasan al-Banna aimed at arriving at the Khilaafah (through involvement in the current secular political apparatus, by hook or by crook) and,
* The Leninist approach of Sayyid Qutb who "Islamicized" the revolutionary ideologies of secular atheist Jews and in particular, Lenin's manifesto with an Islamic garb (see here).
The grievance is that these have been refuted, exposed and demolished by the Scholars of the Sunnah and they are grieved that some of these Scholars highlighted the great evil of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen in splitting the ranks of the Muslims over the latter half of the twentieth century, embedding vile-partisanship in the Ummah, introducing their own legislations in their jamaa'aat and demanding pledges of allegiance to those legislations, rousing and inciting the people to make Takfir of the rulers and to topple them with Leninist type revolutions and so on. The fact that all of this was exposed and refuted, collectively by the Scholars out of naseehah to the people in their religion and out of obedience to Allaah and His Messenger to stand against what is foreign to Allaah's deen, has really grieved these people. A string of individuals such as Safar al-Hawali, Salman al-Awdah, Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaliq, Adnaan Ar'oor, Muhammad al-Maghrawi, Abu al-Hasan al-Ma'ribi amongst others, were all responsible for propagating these methodologies, in varying layers of subtlety, concealed under a veil of what appeared to be Salafiyyah.
The grievance of these people is not really with one particular Scholar (Shaykh Rabee' bin Haadee al-Madkhali) whom they use as a scapegoat. It is actually with the generality of Scholars, particularly in Saudi Arabia, who by Allaah's praise, are upon Tawheed, calling to it, defending it, they are upon the Salafi aqidah, calling to it and defending it, and they are upon the Salafi methodologies in da'wah and reform, opposing and refuting the innovated methodologies which originated with the non-Muslims, and introduced to the Muslims through figureheads like Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. And as Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan said that all of this is a thorn in the throats of the people of hypocrisy and dissension.